Research

Research library

Studies on persistent infection, persister cells, herbal medicines and treatment trials, from both sides of the debate. Each one is summarized and linked to the original paper, often with free full text.

Discuss research & news
Guidelines & Reviews 2008 Infectious Disease Clinics of North America

Chronic Lyme disease: a review

Marques A

An NIH review representing the mainstream view: most "chronic Lyme" diagnoses lack evidence of infection, and controlled trials found no sustained benefit from extended antibiotics. Included here so you can read both sides.

Abstract
Studies have shown that most patients diagnosed with chronic Lyme disease either have no objective evidence of previous or current infection with Borrelia burgdorferi or are patients who should be classified as having post-Lyme disease syndrome, which is defined as continuing or relapsing nonspecific symptoms (such as fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and cognitive complaints) in a patient previously treated for Lyme disease. Despite extensive study, there is currently no clear evidence that post-Lyme disease syndrome is caused by persistent infection with B burgdorferi. Four randomized placebo-controlled studies have shown that antibiotic therapy offers no sustained benefit to patients who have post-Lyme disease syndrome. These studies also showed a substantial placebo effect and a significant risk of treatment-related adverse events. Further research to elucidate the mechanisms underlying persistent symptoms after Lyme disease and controlled trials of new approaches to the treatment and management of these patients are needed.

Summaries are our plain-language reading of each abstract. Lab (in-vitro) and animal results don't always translate to people. Read the original papers and discuss them with your clinician.